If the current political scenario concludes as the media expects, e..g., with Obama as the new president, there’s a good chance that security organizations will have a difficult time practicing preemptive security.
I say this because the administration will be more socialist than previous administrations, and we have already been subjected to a “hands-off” policy by Obama and his campaign when investigations and subsequent commentary pointed out the discovered problems.
Inasmuch as Obama wants to make the country one in which everyone is fair and kind, what will be the result of security organizations taking appropriate steps when information is gathered that indicate a crime or crimes are or may be about to be committed? Will that action be deemed as “politically incorrect”? Will
security’s hands be tied in fear of stepping on someone’s “rights”?
Conversely, will Obama’s administration, which shows all the signs of being strongly socialistic (liberal fascist), use security organizations as a tool in preempting dissent against said administration? This is not far-fetched – just review the political history of the Wilson and FDRoosevelt administrations.
Of course, the above may all be needless concern, but I, for one, believe that security organizations play an important role our country’s internal security – for the businessman, home owner, and citizen. If the private sector security organizations were to be used in any other, this Republic will be in jeopardy.
Tags: obama, obama administration, personal rights, premptive security, republic, roosevelt, security, socialisn, wilson
